Anything With Two Sides
Two villains from unrelated films meet at a flea market that never happened, over a worn coin and a deck of cards, and compare notes on why each one is really carrying what he carries.
What's living in each region? Click an icon to find out.
Two villains from unrelated films meet at a flea market that never happened, over a worn coin and a deck of cards, and compare notes on why each one is really carrying what he carries.
A room at the Royal Statistical Society in 1935, a friendship breaking apart in front of everyone, and two statisticians whose falling out never got the ending anyone expects.
A replica Mona Lisa burns in Glass Onion's finale, and years earlier a napkin finally proves whose idea a company was really built on.
An afternoon at an English research station, a story statisticians have retold for a century, and the woman most versions of it never bother to name.
A mathematician too weak for real work after brain surgery, dealing himself hand after hand of solitaire, and a why-ladder that keeps closing on the same two answers.
A king and his identical twin, one crowned and one masked, and one fixed human need read into five different frameworks across a century.
Two cohorts of shared ancestry, one that stayed and one that migrated, and a methylation signature that still comes back different.
A whimsical walk through DNA's structure, transcription, and translation, told through sprites and imps and checked against the real science at every step.
A reality TV table flip, and the exact heart-rate threshold at which the part of the brain running self-presentation goes offline, camera or no camera.
A look at how mental models work as both reasoning tools and a test for which favorite questions can accept an answer at all.
Four circles overlap here, at a phrase old enough to already carry all of it: living proof. I sit at the point where they cross, and I take an idea, usually something quantitative, and rebuild it until it lands with whoever is in front of me. That is what these posts are. Click a region above to see which essays actually live there, since the title alone does not always give it away.
Proof is the statistics. Living is the ‘omics and the personal growth. And the phrase itself is the storytelling, the idiom used for someone whose life visibly demonstrates the change.
Most of my career so far has happened inside academia, a setting built around precision more than voice. What stayed with me is not a list of duties. It is a habit: the ability to take one idea and reshape it until it lands, no matter who is standing in front of me. The longer I sit with a concept, the more it collapses toward something plain enough to say to anyone. A doctorate and a postdoctoral fellowship did not leave me more certain of the material. They left me trusting that most hard problems, once understood well enough, can be explained simply.
I have explained the same concept to a room of domain experts, to officials who would use it to make policy, to graduate students and undergraduates, and, across the breakfast table, to my own daughters. With the daughters, or the students, I am a storyteller, because that is what the moment is asking for. In a conference, a policy meeting, or the sixty seconds of an elevator pitch to someone deciding whether to fund the work, I am closer to a seller of ideas. That room does not want to be charmed. It wants to be convinced. The version that works for a child is not a simplified version of the one built for the expert. It is a different route to the same understanding, and knowing which route a room needs is a skill in itself.
Years of teaching, research, and consulting gave me something else, too, quieter and less obviously scientific. I do not treat self-development as separate from the thinking that counts. How I talk to myself under pressure matters, and so does how I sit with a failed result before trying again. That kind of introspection feeds the rigor, keeping it sustainable on the day a project is new and exciting, and also on the day it is not, when a numerical experiment has failed for the nth time and something other than the data has to carry you back to the bench.
Every essay here ends with a short reflection, not a summary. The goal is never for a reader to walk away with a term like null hypothesis or power. It is for them to notice the same reasoning already at work somewhere in their own week, so the idea gets used daily, not shelved the moment the page closes.